Go Back   Seriously! Forums > Serious Sam Series > Serious Sam Classic

Serious Sam Classic Discuss anything and everything relating to Serious Sam Classic and its 2 parts; The First Encounter and The Second Encounter.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-12-2018, 04:10 PM   #1   Add To Ignore List  
Artman40's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: House in suburbs
Artman40 is offline
Default Do you think Croteam did serious difficulty a bit wrong?

While adjusting the amount of enemies in a level is a great execution: Croteam missed 2 things when it comes to official levels:

1. A lot of gnaars and beheaded soldiers were replaced by kleer skeletons, often reducing the enemy variety. I think it would have been better if they had used more beheaded soldiers and gnaars in tandem with kleer skeletons. While gnaars and beheaded soldiers in the late game are rather weak compared to weapons you'll have, adding them in battles often brings it subtle changes, forcing you to prioritize the targets a bit more.

2. They gave you double the ammunition compared to normal, hard and mental. While the amount of enemies is larger than in normal difficulty, your ammo supplies are still enough to take down every enemy in the game with some ammo to spare if you're careful. As you have plenty of ammo, you need think less about how you spend your ammunition.
Agree or disagree?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2018, 08:01 AM   #2   Add To Ignore List  
Joined: Apr 2017
CaiusMisus is offline
Default Re: Do you think Croteam did serious difficulty a bit wrong?

About 1), I think that is kind of the point. Same has been done since Wolf 3D and it worked.

Agree with number 2. The double ammo for hardest difficulty has survived since Doom, but that was because enemies respawned. Unfortunately, in Serious Sam, it makes ammo management on serious irrelevant. If a game is balanced for a certain number of enemies, there is 0 reason to give the player double ammo.

I think that Mental difficulty was done wrong. It being based on hard and not serious basically makes it easier than serious by quite a margin. And you are rewarded with more score. The phasing of enemies doesn't matter much (at least to me), but I feel the reduced damage received and number of enemies all the time compared to serious.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2018, 01:24 PM   #3   Add To Ignore List  
Serious Sam(BG)'s Avatar
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Bulgaria
Serious Sam(BG) is offline
Default Re: Do you think Croteam did serious difficulty a bit wrong?

In Serious enemies are dealing the most damage, compared to other difficulties.

Mental is simply "Hard" with flashing enemies.

IMO we need two more difficulty levels:

- SeriousCore - that's Serious with flashing enemies;
- MentalCore - that's Serious with flashing enemies and ammo cut in half.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2018, 10:54 PM   #4   Add To Ignore List  
Virgil Hilts's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Lithuania
Virgil Hilts is offline
Default Re: Do you think Croteam did serious difficulty a bit wrong?

I just finished my Serious Sam: TFE video walkthrough on Serious and can state with ease that they absolutely nailed the difficulty. It's always challenging and extremely fun to play, particularly when some time has passed since your last playthrough, since you remember most things, but more "specific" enemy spawns are a great test of one's reaction speed and accuracy.
  Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So how do you think Croteam should handle difficulty levels in SS4? Artman40 Serious Sam 4 25 09-20-2015 08:48 AM
Serious difficulty with normal difficulty enemy count Jimmieblack Serious Sam HD 0 04-17-2013 12:00 PM
Even a yoga practice can go a bit wrong :-) Artman40 Off Topic Forum 9 01-23-2006 12:10 PM
Possible bug: Wrong difficulty settings Ghost79 Serious Sam 2 5 10-22-2005 06:01 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 PM.